While visiting with more and more LGBTQ people, particularly
over social media where I can get a variety of insights from a wider range of
geographic and cultural contexts, I’ve noticed a new trend. This new trend creates a sense of relief in
me while at the same time chilling me to the bone.
When people talk and connect and engage in a deeper,
story-sharing dialogue, it doesn’t take long for common themes between people
to emerge. For LGBTQ people, who often
grow up isolated and desperate for this kind of connection, obvious themes quickly
emerge. Themes surrounding “When did you
know you were gay/bi/trans?” and “What was coming out like?” and “How did/do
you handle crushes on straight friends?” are top on the sharing list. But the theme I’ve been tracking more and
more? “I thought about/came close
to/attempted suicide when…”
On the one hand I am so incredibly relieved we’ve arrived at
a place, if only internally within the LGBTQ community, in which we can more
openly talk about mental health issues like self-concept and self-harm. It’s ironically no secret that in the culture
of the United States actually talking about mental health is still a difficult
thing. Traditional stigma are still
attached to people who struggle with depression, anxiety, identity, and so
on. People are reluctant to share their
mental health challenges for fear of judgment and, face it, when you already
live with the judgment of huge sectors of society or fear of judgment because
of being who you are, you’re not going to rush out and add fuel to the fire by
saying, “Oh, by the way, I’m not just gay but I’m also depressed and I’ve
seriously thought about suicide.”
But among “our own” we can have these conversations.
And that’s what I find so frightening about this theme. It seems like suicidal ideation and suicide
attempts are becoming a part of the “coming of age narrative” for LGBTQ
people. It’s almost a given that this
theme will surface in conversations within the LGBTQ community. “Yeah, I knew I was gay when I was twelve but
I was terrified to say anything because my parents were super religious. It was so bad, I felt so alone, that I tried
to kill myself when I was fifteen.”
I’ve written before about the isolation LGBTQ people
experience (Oubliette,
Discussions
of Equality in High School) and the human need for community and the
results of not feeling connected with community (complete with research and
statistics) (Community). Today I’m going to bring these topics
together and talk about the real threat the LGBTQ community faces.
Everyone’s heard the phrase “gay agenda.” Most of us make a joke about it anymore,
mocking the religious and political leaders who obviously have no idea of what
it means to be gay or how a person “becomes” LGBTQ. That being said, maybe we need to do, as a
community, what we have always done since the beginning. Maybe we need to grab a hold of these catch
phrases and insults and turn them to our advantage. I would like to suggest that we actually create
a “Gay Agenda” and as item number one on that agenda we list in bold, all caps,
complete with hashtag: #STAYALIVE.
Here are some frightening facts that I found. Keep in mind two things.
1.
When dealing with studies and statistics we
always have to admit that there is an under-reporting that takes place with regard
to self-report. People who want to keep
things on the down-low are never going to be honest when asked questions about
certain topics. An individual who
attempts suicide may simply say he’s dealt with depression “all his life” but
he will choose not to disclose that he has also struggled with his identity for
just as long. Because the individual
fails to self-report the identity piece, the idea that he struggles with
sexuality, his attempt won’t be documented within the body of research
reflecting suicide and suicide attempts in the LGBTQ community. Statistics, though accurate as far as the
study and research are concerned, really don’t capture the reality of the
situation because people fear being honest about things that will bring
judgment and may even out them. And, by
the way, this isn’t just the reality for LGBTQ research. This happens in any kind of study that relies
on any kind of self-reporting.
2.
Similarly, the statistics I’m about to share are
older statistics. Recently I’ve been citing
a survey in which 48% of respondents between the ages of 13 and 20 identified
themselves as exclusively heterosexual.
This means that 52% of young people in this study identified themselves
somewhere in the LGBTQ spectrum. This is
a revolutionary piece of information and I suspect that findings like this
survey are going to be seen more and more among the younger population and we
will eventually see statistics like the ones I’m going to talk about altered
significantly in light of this new information and the willingness to share
it.
I want to make one thing clear. LGBTQ people are not depressed because they
are LGBTQ. They do not consider suicide
because they are LGBTQ and they do not
commit suicide because they are LGBTQ.
There are no mental deficiencies caused by “being gay” any more than “being
gay” is caused be a mental deficiency.
If you still subscribe to this nonsense you are literally stuck in the 1960’s because legitimate science abandoned
your nonsense in the early 1970’s.
So if we’re going to talk about mental health challenges
faced by LGBTQ people, particularly youth, let’s look at real causes rather
than politically motivated causes or religiously imagined causes.
In 2013 the National School Climate Survey reported that “schools
nationwide are hostile environments for a distressing number of LGBT students.” The survey, which was completed by nearly
8,000 students between the ages of 13 and 21 and of whom nearly 60% identified
as gay or lesbian, found:
·
55.5% of LGBT students felt unsafe at school
because of their sexual orientation and 37.8% because of their gender
identification.
·
Roughly 1/3 of LGBT students had missed at least
one day of school in the last month because they didn’t feel safe
·
More than 1/3 avoided gender-segregated spaces
in their schools (i.e., bathrooms, locker rooms) because they felt unsafe
·
Most avoided school functions [Which, of course,
adds to that sense of isolation.]
·
71.4% of LGBT students heard “gay” used in
negative ways and 90.8% felt distressed because of that language
·
64.5% heard other homophobic remarks often
·
56.4% heard negative remarks about “not acting
masculine enough” or “feminine enough” often.
·
1/3 heard negative remarks about transgendered
people
·
51.4% of
students reported hearing homophobic remarks from their teachers or school
staff. 55.5% of students reported
hearing negative remarks about gender expression from teachers or other school
staff. (Again, you
wonder why I had to write about teachers being completely inept at
facilitating conversations about equality and allowing students to talk about “fag
marriage” and “shooting their mentally deficient and gay children?”)
·
74.1% of LGBT students were verbally harassed
(called names, threatened) in the past year because of their orientation. 55.2% because of their gender expression
·
36.2% were physically harassed (pushed, shoved,
etc.) because of their orientation.
22.7% because of their gender expression.
·
16.5% were physically assaulted because of their
orientation. 11.4 because of their
gender expression.
·
Almost half of LGBT students experienced
electronic harassment/cyber bullying (i.e., text messages, facebook messages)
·
Nearly 2/3
of LGBT students who were harassed or assaulted in school did not report the
incident to school staff usually because they doubted the effectiveness of any
intervention. [Which you can
understand why when teachers/staff are contributing to the hostility of the
environment.]
·
Over 2/3
of the students who did report an incident indicated the school staff did
nothing.
·
Nearly 1/3 of LGBT students reported being
disciplined for the same public displays of affection non-LGBT students engaged
in freely.
·
18.1% of LGBT students were prevented from
attending school dances/functions with a same gender date/partner.
·
17.8% of students were not allowed to form or
promote support groups.
·
17.5% of students were prohibited from
discussing or writing about LGBT topics in school assignments.
·
15.5% were prevented from wearing clothing or
items supporting LGBT issues.
·
9.2% of
students reported being disciplined for simply identifying as LGBT.
·
Policies which were reported that directly
affected transgender youth:
o
42.2% of transgender students were prevented
from even using their preferred name. [Which makes you wonder considering how
many non-trans students are allowed to use stupid nicknames born from athletic
participation, right?]
o
59.2% of transgender students had been required
to use a bathroom or locker room based on their so-called “legal sex.”
o
31.6% of transgender students had been prevented
from wearing clothes considered inappropriate for their “legal sex.”
Now this is where we get into the actual effects of all of
this hostility, inequality, intolerance, and blatant ignorance and hate.
Students who experienced higher levels of victimization
because of their sexual orientation were three times as likely to have missed
school in the past month, had lower grade point averages compared to students
who were “less often harassed” (2.8 vs. 3.3), were twice as likely to report a
lack of plan/desire to pursue college or trade school, and had higher levels of depression and lower levels of self-esteem.
Students who experienced higher levels of victimization
because of their gender expression were three times as likely to miss school in
the past month, had lower GPAs, were twice as likely to report they didn’t plan
to pursue higher education, and had
higher levels of depression and lower levels of self-esteem.
These same statistics translate from victimization to
discrimination.
A .pdf of the entire study can be found here.
How does all of this play out? How does all of this well-documented violence
and hostility toward a specific and vulnerable sector of America’s youth
translate into tragedy and the loss of life?
A
2012 Stonewall Survey gives us some insight. Young gay men are 30 times more likely to
attempt suicide than their heterosexual counterparts. Lesbian young people are six times more
likely to attempt suicide. Some have
made up to nine unsuccessful attempts to kill themselves. The
highest rates of suicide are among those who are isolated from support.
This same article reports “US News reported that teenage gay
people who have been rejecred by their
parents are far more likely to self-harm, take hard drugs and commit suicide
than teenagers who are…loved and supported by their parents.”
25% to 60% of gay people seek counseling at some stage in
their life as reported by the Counseling Directory.
But where does all of this come back to? Where do people receive tacit and/or overt
approval for their intolerance and ignorance?
This is a hard question for me to actually answer not because the answer
is elusive but because admitting it ultimately leads to an admission of a
certain amount of complacency. The
answer? The Church. Or more specifically: Religious and faith communities and institutions.
It doesn’t take a lot of research to convince people that
traditional religious understanding bolsters contemporary intolerance of LGBTQ
people. It’s common knowledge. It’s as well and basically understood as
knowing the KKK is not a supporter for the African-American community. More and more research is published in which
people, victimized
by narrow and superstitious understandings of religious texts, share their
stories and bring awareness to the damage the Church, for example, has done for
generations.
And it’s not just the Christian Church struggling with these
issues and attempting to push back against hundreds of years of intolerance and
ignorance. A 2012 study of Suicide and Suicidal Behavior
in Tel Aviv discovered “a staggering 20% of the homosexuals and lesbians
surveyed reported suicide attempts—112 times the rate among the general
population.” The study goes on to note
that “this sector…does not get enough notice, and it is a hotbed for suicides
that you later hear about after the fact.
The suicide rate among the religious
homosexuals is the highest because they experience more distress when confronting
their families.”
I cannot tell you how angry reading studies and reports like
this makes me. I cannot tell you how my
heart aches when I hear people share their stories of rejection by faith
communities who claim to embody the love of God and the ministry of Jesus
Christ. I grew
up in the Church. I still consider
myself a part of the Church. But the
Church makes me so angry when their hypocrisy reaches this breaking point, when
they claim to be the Body of Christ, to embody the Spirit of Jesus of Nazareth
who led people beyond their self-imposed boundaries to people who were
different, though differently, behaved differently, loved differently—not to
preach at them or tell them how they need to change but to simply love them—and
then these same Churches preach a doctrine of intolerance that creates fear and
self-loathing in LGBTQ people who fear not only losing the love and connection
of their family but, through hateful and ignorant words, feel themselves cast
far away from the love of God.
We have SO MUCH work to do—in our religious communities, in
our schools, and in our society at large.
No subset of our population should have to share stories of their suicide
attempts any more than they should have to share stories of police violence and
institutional racism. We have to do
better. We have to educate ourselves
better.
We have to #STAYALIVE because it is getting better. We need you to help make that happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment