Okay.
I’ve debated long enough on this topic and I’ve decided to
write about it. I went back and forth on
it not because I didn’t feel competent and comfortable writing on the
topic. If anything I’m too comfortable
and competent to write on it. I was
hesitant because I try very hard not to focus on religion in my blogging
because religion has hurt too many LGBTQ people, including myself, and I don’t want to keep rubbing salt in the
wounds.
I also didn’t want to “tip my hand” and maybe show too much
non-Troy Comets knowledge through my Troy Comets activity. What I mean is this: Troy Comets has never disclosed what he does
off of the internet or what the person behind Troy Comets has actually
studied. I’ve hinted that if you look at
my writing you can probably figure out what I’ve studied and how much time I’ve
spent in those studies. After reading this
post you may have a more complete idea.
I’m not 100% certain that’s a good thing…but I’m 100% certain it’s not
all a bad thing either.
But, here’s the thing.
1.
Trying to avoid talking about religion because
of the pain it has caused us isn’t going to make that pain go away. Maybe I’m wrong to avoid the topic the way I
do. Maybe I should acknowledge religion’s
role in the oppression of the LGBTQ community more. Maybe I should acknowledge our pain—my pain—more
in my writing. Maybe it could be more a
part of the healing process than I’ve previously imagined it could be. All I know is that I don’t want this blog to
become “Troy Comets’ Ongoing Commentary about How Messed Up the Church Is.” Though I know there’s MORE THAN ENOUGH to
talk about there, there’s more for us, LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ people alike, to
worry about and talk about.
2.
Sometimes I can’t turn off the things I
know. It would be nice. Believe me.
Sometimes I can’t think of anything that would bring me more peace than
to forget half the things I know. But,
as I write this, it’s Holy Saturday.
Tomorrow is Easter. We’re ending
Holy Week….and, as a Christian person of faith, religion is all around me right
now and I can’t escape it. Add to that
the fact that I’ve wasted an hour and a half of my life today by watching Tyler
Perry’s “The Passion Live” and I’m more than a little angry about how ignorant
the Church is about its own heritage and its own story.
I just tweeted a comment that to understand the Passion of
Jesus, the whole story that’s told between what is usually referred to as “The
Triumphal Entry” (Palm Sunday) through the Last Supper, the trial and
execution, and ends with the Resurrection—to understand any of this, a person needs to understand politics in first century
Palestine. Let me explain why.
The Jewish leaders get a bad rap in traditional
Christianity. As they’re portrayed in
biblical interpretations throughout history they are the antagonists to our
hero, Jesus. They try to shut him
down. They want to argue with them. They appear clueless and obstinate. Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact of the matter is that these were
faithful men of God. They were not only
adhering to the interpretation of Hebrew Scriptures that had been handed down
to them but they were also trying to protect their people.
Judea, where the bulk of Jesus’ ministry takes place in the
four biblical Gospels, was an occupied territory. Since its fall in “Old Testament Times” it
had changed ownership a number of times.
It was prime real estate. You
couldn’t travel anywhere in the region without moving through Israel and
Judea. At the time of Jesus, it’s Rome
that holds the deed to Judea and Rome wasn’t known for its kind and gentle ways
when it came to occupation.
Within living memory of most of the elders of the Jewish
people at the time of Jesus there was at least one revolt that was stamped out
tragically by Rome. What the leaders understood
was that there was going to be no uprising as long as Rome was a factor. There would be no independence until God’s anointed
appeared, the “messiah” or “Christ,” who would lead God’s chosen people back to
their chosen status in the world.
So when Jesus, who overtly and tacitly claims to be this
messiah, begins to amass a following, who challenges the status quo, who
attracts people like Judas the Zealot to his cause—when the leadership begins
to see this, it makes them worried. They
see the makings of another revolt and, remembering the last revolt and how Rome
dealt with it, they begin planning ways to get Jesus out of the picture before
it’s too late. Why do you think one of
the charges the Jewish leaders argue in front of their Roman rulers is, “He’s
no friend of Caesar’s?” He’s a traitor
and you need to deal with him.
So, of course, he’s dealt with. There’s a trial in which Pontius Pilate
famously gives the people a choice between two prisoners—Jesus or
Barabbas. Never mind the fact that no
such tradition even existed. Our English
Bibles tell us that Barabbas was a criminal/murderer. The actual word in Greek which describes him
is “zealot.” Like Judas, Barabbas was a
freedom fighter. He was a patriot. He probably would have been considered a “terrorist”
by today’s standards. Which would you
choose if you were under occupation?
Someone who just a few days ago came to town with under the auspices of
being the messiah who would kick Rome out but the most he could do was throw a
tantrum in the Temple? Or the guy with
the proven track record of undermining the occupational forces? The gospel author is making a point here—not giving
us a history lesson.
If you watched “The Passion Live” on FOX you might remember
Tyler Perry’s explanation of what crucifixion was like and then what was done
with the body. According to Tyler Perry’s
script, Jesus was buried in a tomb which was sealed with a boulder and guarded
by Roman soldiers—all under Pilate’s orders.
Of course nothing like it happened.
The earliest Gospel we have is Mark.
Mark tells us that it was the day of preparation. We already know it’s late in the afternoon so
the pressure’s on under Jewish religious law to get things done before Sabbath
begins. Joseph of Arimathea, who is
identified as a Jewish leader, comes to Pilate and asks for the body. Pilate gives it to him and Joseph of
Arimathea quickly buries Jesus in Joseph’s own tomb. It really was a “hurry up and get it done”
affair. Sabbath was hours and minutes
away. This is why later in the story the
women return on the first day of the week (Sunday) to do the burial rituals after Sabbath.
What Tyler Perry’s scriptwriter and the majority of
Christians fail to understand here is the process of developing what Christian
theologians call “a high Christology.”
What this means is that years and years after the fact, followers of “The
Way” (which is what this sect of Judaism was initially called) struggled to
make the story of Jesus flow out of the story of God as recorded in the Hebrew
Scriptures. We see the beginnings of the
development of this Christology in Mark, with its use of the terms “Christ” and
“Son of God.” Mark, remember, was
written about 35 years after Jesus’
death. But this Christology advances
again by the time Matthew and Luke are written, roughly 20 years after
Mark. Matthew and Luke begin to answer
questions that the earliest Christian community started asking. Questions like “Where did Jesus come from?” In reply, Matthew and Luke give detailed
birth narratives. They also address the
arguments of skeptics. “Maybe Jesus wasn’t
really dead.” This is why in Matthew one
of the Roman soldiers impales Jesus’ through the side with the spear. “Maybe someone stole Jesus’ body and created
the whole resurrection story.” Again,
this is why Matthew has Pilate setting guards on the tomb.
But Christians have done exactly what Tyler Perry’s scriptwriters have
done throughout history. We don’t pay
attention to what is written or ask why it’s written the way it is. Instead, we harmonize the stories and
stupidly recite them during the most holy times in our religious calendar. Like Christmas. All of a sudden we have Mary and Joseph
having a child in a barn (because there’s a feed trough being used) and we
simultaneously have angels (which, by the way, are messengers from God and not
divine beings with wings. The whole
angelic cult is developed later.) and wise men from the East showing up all at
the same time. Never mind the fact that
the wisemen (of an undesignated number, by the way. Scripture never tells us three beyond three
gifts which are symbolic in their own right) show up YEARS after Jesus’ birth.
This is what makes me so freaking angry about my fellow
adherents to the Christian faith: Too
many people are comfortable in their ignorance, blindly accepting the watered
down, dumbed down, Christian message that generations of preachers and pastors
and priests have massaged to diminish its power and “teeth.” Again, for an example, I turn to “The Passion
Live” in which the song performed to capture the spirit of this “triumphal
entry” into Jerusalem is “Love can Move Mountains” by Celine Dion. The triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem
was not “lovey dovey, love conquers all” nonsense. It was a protest. It was desperation. The crowd was shouting “Hosanna!” Hoshi’ana! “SAVE US!” People were flocking to the person who was supposed
to be their liberator crying out in pain and anguish!
How many congregations capture that spirit in their annual Palm Sunday parades of palm waving and
Sunday School children singing?
But this is the issue:
All of these biblically conservative Christians who, like the people
they vilify in the gospel stories, may mean well. But unlike the people they treat as
antagonists in the Jesus story, they are completely oblivious to what it is
they’re reading, where it came from, and how it’s been transmitted.
And it drives me nuts.
This brings me back to “The Passion Live” once again. This feel good, for club members only, overly
produced, poorly researched and written spectacular dumbed the story down still
further and didn’t pause to consider the full implication of the music they
chose to accentuate the story.
For example. Trisha
Yearwood as Mary singing “In the end only kindness matters.” Really?
See, the biblical message claims that in the end it’s the love of God
that matters. Or Jencarlos Canela as Jeuss singing “I won’t give up if you don’t
give up.” Really? The commitment of Jesus Christ is dependent on
my commitment? Then we’re all screwed because, newsflash,
human beings are fickle creatures incapable of commitment. That’s why the biblical message highlights
God’s commitment to humanity trumping humanity’s commitment to God.
What’s worse than picking songs with bad theology? Picking songs that capture good theology and
thinking that the people singing the song will embody the meaning of the
song. I’m referring to the song used by “The
Passion Live” at the climax of the performance:
Unconditionally
Come just as you are to me
Don't need apologies
Know that you are all worthy
I'll take your bad days with your good
Walk through this storm I would
I'll do it because I love you, I love you
This! This is the message that so many people, so many people in so many subsets of our society, not just the LGBTQ community--but SO MANY PEOPLE need to hear. It's the message of the story of God told through the pages of the Christian Bible. It's the power behind the Hebrew word chessed and the Greek word agape. It's unconditional love--it's love poured out without qualification, without prerequisite, without the receiver moving himself or herself to a place in which they might "fit in better" or "conform more appropriately" the beliefs and behaviors of any particularly community that holds power and domination. It's a love that says, "You. Just as you are. You are special. You are loved. Just the way you are."
Come just as you are to me
Don't need apologies
Know that you are all worthy
I'll take your bad days with your good
Walk through this storm I would
I'll do it because I love you, I love you
This! This is the message that so many people, so many people in so many subsets of our society, not just the LGBTQ community--but SO MANY PEOPLE need to hear. It's the message of the story of God told through the pages of the Christian Bible. It's the power behind the Hebrew word chessed and the Greek word agape. It's unconditional love--it's love poured out without qualification, without prerequisite, without the receiver moving himself or herself to a place in which they might "fit in better" or "conform more appropriately" the beliefs and behaviors of any particularly community that holds power and domination. It's a love that says, "You. Just as you are. You are special. You are loved. Just the way you are."
The Church will join Jencarlos Canela. It will sing this
song, add it to its repertoire of “contemporary hymns” and then it will turn
around and, as a rule, insist gay people should be straight, people in poverty
should pull themselves up by the bootstraps, that women should be obedient to
their husbands…..you get the idea.
Which makes me wonder how Katy Perry feels about the Church
coopting her song.
Look, I get it. The
Church, like every other human institution whether religious or secular, is
flawed. It’s broken. It’s far from perfect. That’s what happens when human beings enter
the picture and try to take something as powerful as a movement like civil
rights or Christianity and make it a system.
It’s going to lose momentum, power, and even sight of its mission and
purpose. That doesn’t mean we can use
that as an excuse. That doesn’t mean we
can ignore the damage we’ve done and continue to do. That doesn’t mean we forgive our own blatant
ignorance and hypocrisy when we sing songs like “Unconditionally” but turn
around and tell people to “give up your sinful ways and be something you can’t
possibly be and then God will love
you.”
The reason I’m rethinking my approach to religion and the
Church, at least for this post, is that it’s Easter in the Western Church. It’s the season of resurrection, renewal, and
hope. Traditionally and historically it’s
understood as a moment of profound change where God alters the rules and breaks
down barriers that seem unbreakable. It’s
a season of forgiveness. It’s a
celebration of how far God is willing to go to demonstrate God’s love.
For people reading this who are solidly inside the Church,
maybe the barrier that God is breaking down is the barrier that keeps you from
exploring and even challenging the theology that has been handed to you.
For people reading this who are outside of the Church
because it is where you have been placed by people within the Church or where
you have placed yourself for your own protection and self-preservation, maybe
the renewal that God is offering you is the renewal of God’s promise of
unconditional love—whether the institutional Church is willing to offer it to
you or not. If it’s one thing that has
been made abundantly clear: God does not
need the participation or approval of faith institutions to love God’s
children.
For people reading this for whom faith is not a part of your
life, I hope I haven’t offended or bored you.
Thank you for giving me the space to share these thoughts.
As always, feel free to share these thoughts forward.
Follow me on Twitter@TroyComets
As always, feel free to share these thoughts forward.
Follow me on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment